To get a more deeper understanding of where my uncertainties for space and art can interact, I looked this article about the book called “The Dialectics of Art” by John Molyneux.
The book talks about how art is affected by the conditions of how the world was when this particular art was created. The author approaches art with the understanding that, creating art is a social process, All art is produced in particular circumstances and the various attitudes it expresses the society and its ideas. The author’s opening argument centres on Marx’s concept of alienation, that unlike most other forms of work or labour in capitalist society, the work process of the artists is unalienated.
For Marx, alienation under capitalism is the way the system works. Alienation is a product of the fact that capitalism is driven by blind, competition, the competition for profit. Marx argued that capitalism has deformed art in a number of ways. Learning more about this book made me come across an interesting term called, “art-washing”, The tax-free endowments given by big corporations to the big art galleries shows that leaders understand the importance of what has come to be called ‘art-washing’.

This word made me think about the term “greenwashing” which is being used quite a lot in today’s time due to decieving nature of corporations wanting to seen more sustainable than they actually are. The pressure of being sustainable is actually being put upon the consumers instead of the big corporations which are actually the ones who are harming the environment.
To get more information about consumer sustainability, I read an article by sartorial magazine, titled, “Thrifting is not guilt free”. “Gentrification and high-jacking of thrift store items is a reflection of the larger, systemic inequality that arises from exploitative capitalism which values profit over narrowing the wealth gap and protecting the planet”.
“No ethical consumption under capitalism” by many anti-capitalists because the very nature of capitalism is to exploit those on the bottom. Every worker is paid less than the value of their work, in order for those who own the means of production to make a profit. In other words, as long as this capitalist structure exists, a mass shift into thrifting may solve some ethical dilemmas but will inevitably cause others to surface. We as people of this generation are trying to make conscious choices as consumers. This is not enough to combat the major issues such as climate change, unfair wages, and outsourcing of labor if we don’t address the larger source of the problem. Many companies come to mind when I hear about mass produced fast fashion such as shein, h&m etc. As pointed out by one of my classmates, who witnessed a canada goose display at oxford street covered in plants, that none of these tactics are actually very convincing in make the company look better.
References:
http://sartorialmagazine.com/fashion-1/2020/6/28/thrifting-isnt-guilt-free
http://arthistoryunstuffed.com/marxism-art-artist/
http://www.e-flux.com/journal/43/60205/art-without-market-art-without-education-political-economy-of-art/
http://www.counterfire.org/article/culture-under-capitalism-why-art-is-alienated-the-dialectics-of-art-review/